BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//conferences.acspri.org.au//2026//talk//N9JUXR
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:AEST
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20000326T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3;UNTIL=20050326T170000Z
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20060402T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=20060401T170000Z
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20070325T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=4SU;BYMONTH=3;UNTIL=20070324T170000Z
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20080406T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000827T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=4SU;BYMONTH=8;UNTIL=20000826T170000Z
TZNAME:AEDT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20011028T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10;UNTIL=20071027T170000Z
TZNAME:AEDT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20081005T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:AEDT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-2026-N9JUXR@conferences.acspri.org.au
DTSTART;TZID=AEST:20261125T111500
DTEND;TZID=AEST:20261125T113000
DESCRIPTION:This study develops a practice-based and institutionally embedd
 ed understanding of sustainability in peer-to-peer accommodation (P2PA) th
 rough a systematic literature review of host sustainability practices. Dra
 wing on Social Practice Theory and an institutional perspective\, the revi
 ew examines how sustainability practices are configured\, enacted\, and re
 produced within everyday hosting contexts.\n\nSustainability has become an
  increasingly important concern in P2PA research\, particularly in relatio
 n to environmental impacts\, community relations\, and responsible consump
 tion. P2PA provides a particularly informative empirical setting because s
 ustainability is enacted through the continual integration of environmenta
 l\, social\, cultural\, and economic practices within everyday host–gues
 t\, community\, and place-based interactions. However\, existing research 
 has often focused on structural conditions\, consumer attitudes\, and sust
 ainability outcomes\, with comparatively less attention to how sustainabil
 ity is enacted through hosts’ everyday practices.\n\nHosts play a centra
 l role in translating sustainability into everyday accommodation practices
  through their daily decisions and interactions. Understanding how hosts i
 nterpret\, adapt\, and enact sustainability is therefore essential for exp
 laining how sustainability is realised in P2PA.  This presents not only a 
 substantive research gap but also a methodological challenge for evidence 
 synthesis: how can evidence of sustainability practice be identified acros
 s studies that conceptualise and examine sustainability in different ways?
 \n\nThis study addresses this challenge through a qualitative systematic l
 iterature review of host-level sustainability practices in P2PA. Guided by
  an interpretivist perspective\, the review combines a PRISMA-informed sea
 rch and screening process with qualitative thematic synthesis. Searches of
  Web of Science and Scopus identified 762 records published between 2008 a
 nd December 2025. After deduplication\, 492 records were screened\, 72 und
 erwent full-text assessment\, and 69 studies were included in the final sy
 nthesis. \n\nA central methodological feature is a practice-first screenin
 g and coding strategy. Rather than treating all studies framed as sustaina
 bility research as equivalent sources of practice evidence\, the review di
 stinguishes between empirical evidence of enacted host practices and studi
 es focused primarily on guest attitudes\, sustainability intentions\, plat
 form policies\, or destination-level outcomes. Studies providing direct ev
 idence of what hosts do\, implement\, or manage are treated as core eviden
 ce. Studies offering host-actionable recommendations without directly exam
 ining host practices are considered supplementary contextual evidence. Thi
 s distinction strengthens analytical clarity by preventing recommendations
  and intentions from being conflated with observed practices.\n\nThe synth
 esis combines Social Practice Theory with an institutional perspective. NV
 ivo-assisted thematic analysis examines how sustainability practices are c
 onfigured through meanings\, competences\, and materials\, while also cons
 idering institutional influences such as platform governance\, market pres
 sures\, community infrastructure\, and regulatory arrangements. This appro
 ach connects everyday hosting activities with the wider conditions that en
 able\, constrain\, and reshape them.\n\nThe findings identify selective en
 actment as a key process: sustainability practices are rarely simply adopt
 ed or rejected\, but are modified\, combined\, maintained\, or abandoned i
 n response to hosts’ values\, capabilities\, resources\, guest expectati
 ons\, and wider institutional conditions. The analysis also reveals creati
 ve value integration\, whereby practices such as local sourcing\, cultural
  storytelling\, waste reduction\, and community collaboration can simultan
 eously support sustainability\, guest experience\, business differentiatio
 n\, and community benefits.\n\nThe presentation concludes by considering t
 he wider methodological implications of practice-oriented qualitative synt
 hesis. It demonstrates how clearly defining the actor and unit of analysis
 \, distinguishing enacted practices from attitudes and prescriptions\, and
  integrating micro-level practices with institutional contexts can generat
 e more meaningful explanations from heterogeneous research. More broadly\,
  the study highlights the importance of explicit conceptual boundaries and
  transparent screening decisions when synthesising heterogeneous interdisc
 iplinary literatures\, particularly where broad social science concepts ar
 e conceptualised and operationalised in different ways across studies.
DTSTAMP:20261013T070011Z
LOCATION:Holme Room
SUMMARY:Identifying Sustainability in Everyday Practice: A Practice-Based S
 ystematic Review of Peer-to-Peer Accommodation - Yangyang Liu
URL:https://conferences.acspri.org.au/2026/talk/N9JUXR/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
