BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//conferences.acspri.org.au//2026//speaker//LNQGSJ
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:AEST
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20000326T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3;UNTIL=20050326T170000Z
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20060402T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=20060401T170000Z
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20070325T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=4SU;BYMONTH=3;UNTIL=20070324T170000Z
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20080406T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
TZNAME:AEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000827T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=4SU;BYMONTH=8;UNTIL=20000826T170000Z
TZNAME:AEDT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20011028T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10;UNTIL=20071027T170000Z
TZNAME:AEDT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20081005T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:AEDT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-2026-DTMS8Q@conferences.acspri.org.au
DTSTART;TZID=AEST:20261125T173000
DTEND;TZID=AEST:20261125T173500
DESCRIPTION:Mixed methods research is often portrayed as a straightforward\
 , step-by-step procedure\, yet this portrayal overlooks the real-world cha
 llenges of fieldwork and the ethical and responsive approaches needed to a
 ddress them. This can leave novice researchers ill-prepared to navigate th
 e realities of fieldwork. Drawing on fieldwork with smallholder farmers ex
 periencing heat stress in Northern Ghana\, this paper introduces “fieldw
 ork frictions” to describe disruptions arising from farm activities\, po
 sitionality and local uncertainties. Rather than treating these frictions 
 as methodological failures\, it argues that they are integral to the resea
 rch process — actively shaping how knowledge is produced and challenging
  the assumed linearity of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. 
 An ethnography-inspired approach demonstrates how engaging with these fric
 tions can enhance the contextualisation of quantitative findings and deepe
 n qualitative inquiry\, better capturing field realities. Recognising thes
 e frictions also sheds light on power dynamics inherent in research with v
 ulnerable smallholder farmers. The paper offers three practical methodolog
 ical lessons for novice researchers: treat fieldwork frictions as opportun
 ities for insight rather than obstacles\; remain reflexive and flexible\, 
 adapting ethically as needed rather than adhering rigidly to the original 
 blueprint\; and\, where possible\, incorporate ethnography-inspired insigh
 ts to enhance contextual sensitivity and integration across mixed methods.
  This approach enhances the rigour of mixed methods research by producing 
 insights firmly grounded in a specific field context.
DTSTAMP:20261102T131138Z
LOCATION:Drawing Room
SUMMARY:Doing Mixed Methods in Context: Fieldwork Frictions\, Reflexivity a
 nd an Ethnography-Inspired Approach in Heat Stress Studies in Ghana - Jose
 ph Alhassan
URL:https://conferences.acspri.org.au/2026/talk/DTMS8Q/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-2026-GGSSAM@conferences.acspri.org.au
DTSTART;TZID=AEST:20261126T114500
DTEND;TZID=AEST:20261126T120000
DESCRIPTION:Mixed methods research is often portrayed as a straightforward\
 , step-by-step procedure\, yet this portrayal overlooks the real-world cha
 llenges of fieldwork and the ethical and responsive approaches needed to a
 ddress them. This can leave novice researchers ill-prepared to navigate th
 e realities of fieldwork. Drawing on fieldwork with smallholder farmers ex
 periencing heat stress in Northern Ghana\, this paper introduces “fieldw
 ork frictions” to describe disruptions arising from farm activities\, po
 sitionality\, and local uncertainties. Rather than treating these friction
 s as methodological failures\, it argues that they are integral to the res
 earch process — actively shaping how knowledge is produced and challengi
 ng the assumed linearity of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design
 . An ethnography-inspired approach demonstrates how engaging with these fr
 ictions can enhance the contextualisation of quantitative findings and dee
 pen qualitative inquiry\, better capturing field realities. Recognising th
 ese frictions also sheds light on power dynamics inherent in research with
  vulnerable smallholder farmers. The paper offers three practical methodol
 ogical lessons for novice researchers: treat fieldwork frictions as opport
 unities for insight rather than obstacles\, recognising their generative p
 otential\; remain reflexive and flexible\, adapting ethically as needed ra
 ther than adhering rigidly to the original blueprint\; and\, where possibl
 e\, incorporate ethnography-inspired insights to enhance contextual sensit
 ivity and integration across mixed methods. This approach enhances the rig
 our of mixed methods research by producing insights firmly grounded in a s
 pecific field context.
DTSTAMP:20261102T131138Z
LOCATION:Holme Room
SUMMARY:Doing Mixed Methods in Context: Fieldwork Frictions\, Reflexivity a
 nd an Ethnography-Inspired Approach in Heat Stress Studies in Ghana - Jose
 ph Alhassan
URL:https://conferences.acspri.org.au/2026/talk/GGSSAM/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR